70page

d€ _ rlHl2.l ^IgaJ4. ., xlflz}= €'"J6lr oJrjJ4oJ e5_-g_ "Jzlt, qlqls _r5g HI *e trdzlz} rSql 4l r'l 4 B_6irll aE6}4l 6l:- fl"Jol 9 zl.r +4. tsde EdzI9 +(tr)+ trd^lEel 4+(EH)ql 4+ g?+e + 9i4.4+Eel ?e + + ^I+g zlflz}4 -J ^IEIE Edzlzl Ed€. 6Jtr1. EdzlE zlflr.l= rJ7I6Ir.4 eg .flilrl. -J zlzl r.I"Je q €E qldulzl zlzlel zltlzlE EdaI= ?"14, ol elaJ +€E HBg u-=: +g +=E zl+ql ,196}= zl"Jql rIaI Crlg4. ?C€= EdzI zl7+e) elAg .J6Iq ol+ol d+. ulzlu| €^le- g|F 6rilzl zE9 Edgg.rl E.J tr 8"14. u}]zlzjp EdzlE:!i9 afl= F'J6}q aA€-,44q. €zlrler}= B4 Ede qt'4g dts*"J"]4. EdzIts zlSzl9 6J=.oI ""i6Jg ryl,lyl. zlgz}ts Edzlql 4l ee "Jtlg dq +a Eel 4"J ?-ag 6IE+ alErll, ol trl+ *4ss= .J 6Jg ul zl el J. r.4 6.Jtrl. HlEql E d zlzl zlfl zlql 4l .J 6J-g- € + 9l= ris. rldolrl. trdzlE "Jrll s--e2il "*oI", "Ee]alu]l", "F96};<l g*ol"4,J-."- 'gg 6IIrEql zlgzi9 HI+g HEI^I? + 9i4(Verplank, rgss). Edzlg Hltq4?l Hi-3-(6I+i6IZ+, *zJ'i, Eg-g- 4l+4 7-14, Eg +ulol= Cs. €')s. zlflzI9 "JFql g'Jg "l a + 91trI. Alc+71 Edz}g aJEol EdE Ar+.I "J6.J-g- ,14 fs. 9l+. :t _ 4^l trdd}= :'ql, EdzI zltl9 aJ.E,ol :a zltlz}T} ]l+gi?zl q+ql ++ ec4ql g"Jol I + 9ttr1. ae"l 9l-:. EdzlE- trdE A4ql El il= z}tlg 6JEo _g_ =lrElrl 7)= E=El€ Ed+€g trl+.JtrI. -lal a-1 DJx{7i;r[ol 7ix{ool JE J I r-l t= = .+l-l = Ci4J =^] :N. Schmitt, Social Situational Determinants of Interview Decisions Implications for the Employment Interview. Personnel Psychology, 29, 1976, pp.79- 101. H d zI 'rl e ,q9l ( €, r-l-"1 , ql * . ^lsl - .J '<I 1l zlgi) E|]Y!dzI u1|e H9! ( t, u}"l, 9l F ^IEl - a 4l z-l algj ) EI _ E, E zl, zl zl. ,l r|], jt C S.,l rll _ -- , 9; Ll , zl tl . zlrtl, ri€+I\l 3l?alr- (efl. iz! z| 5-1 3l urcg (d6J, .n r! zI *) rll t! il z| 6J -E- i,i el r,, .:lEJ zl $ ?l ( ,-l -\'- ^l 11, ol del "J il zl- 5,) * .J 1l H 9l( 3l .i ^l *. "l 1.1e1 r]] .,J d zI -5- ) 'I il 11,'I 72